The works of the third period of Reza Abbasi’ s life, which are related to the time of his return to the court, have not been yet extensively s tudied. By reviewing the political, religious, literary, intellectual, and economic situation, this article intends to answer the following ques tions that what is the meaning and meaning of the works of the third period of Reza Abbasi’ s life, and what difference do they show in the artis t’ s approach compared to the firs t and second periods of his life? The works of this s tudy consis t of five paintings including: «Golgasht with Ashrafzadeh (right)», «Golgasht with Ashrafzadeh (left)», «Golgasht in the desert», «Lovers and old man» and «Thief, poet, and Dogs ” . They have been purposefully selected as a perfect example of the artis t’ s dominant approach in the third period of his life. This research is considered fundamental in terms of purpose, and with an interpretive-his torical method and collecting information from library sources, including primary sources and new research, it has analyzed the subject. The results show that the works of the third period of Reza Abbasi’ s life express a dual and critical approach to life, part of which is derived from the experiences of the period away from the court. Reza Abbasi’ s time is a very important period in the his tory of Iran from a political, social, and artis tic point of view due to its coincidence with the reign of Shah Abbas. The abundance of articles and research about the life and works of Reza Abbasi shows his importance in the his tory of Iranian art. Despite leaving and rejoining the court, he is an artis t who has been revered by prominent figures of his time. Nevertheless, a series of contradictions rooted in the pas t and the events of that time raises many issues. Conflicts about tradition and modernity, different or new religions and beliefs, old and new military forces, confrontations between the court and the tribes, are only part of this chain. Reza Abbasi entered the court simultaneously as a talented young man in the field of painting and left the court in 1011 AH for various reasons. His torians of Shah Abbas’ s court, including Iskanderbeg and Ghazi Ahmad Qomi, in addition to describing his characteris tics, cite his connection with intimidators and wres tlers as reasons he did not get much respect. Reza Abbasi returned to the court in 1018 AH and resumed his work as a painter. According to Canby, this dis tance and his return to the court divide Reza Abbasi’ s life into three parts: the firs t period, which coincides with his early works, the second period, which is known as the period of rebellion, and the third period, which corresponds to the return of Reza Abbasi to the court. Meanwhile, the las t period of Reza Abbasi’ s life is doubly important for two reasons. Firs t, the amount of researche so far has been more focused on the rebellious period of Reza Abbasi and less on the third period of his life. The second is the maturity of Reza Abbasi’ s works in this period and considering the third period as the result of his artis tic life. More than his previous works, the works of the third period challenge the presuppositions and attitudes about the art of painting and the methodology of analyzing the artworks. The present s tudy aims to explain the thematic features of the works of the third period of Reza Abbasi’ s life by relying on the artis t’ s life. The main ques tion is that, considering the his torical context, what meaning do the works of the third period of Reza Abbasi’ s life hold, and the second ques tion is that compared to the firs t and second periods of Reza Abbasi’ s life, how these works show his different approach from the pas t. The use of a balanced and comprehensive method in the art of painting have mutual importance. Firs t, it is possible to get a more accurate unders tanding of his tory from information about art and examine the artis t’ s living conditions from another perspective. Second, one can get closer to creativity in contemporary art and thought by carefully recognizing and analyzing all of these themes in pas t art. In order to deal with this method, it is necessary to put together the historical contexts, the contexts of the thoughts around it to reconstruct the life of the artist and, most importantly, a detailed analysis of the theme of the works of art. This research, which is considered qualitative, with an interpretive-his torical method, intends to analyze the inferential analysis of the s tudied subject by collecting information from library sources, including primary sources and the new research. The s tatis tical population includes the works of the third period of Reza Abbasi’ s life and the s tudied samples include five drawings that have been selected purposefully and rely on a theoretical framework. According to the his torical method used in this article, firs t, the situation of the rulers of the time, a set of socio-political contexts, economic situation, his tory of literature, and contemporary thought of Reza Abbasi is s tudied. After recognizing these cases and receiving a picture of the formation of the works, the theme of the works and their various dimensions, based on the shreds of evidence and documents, are analyzed. The issue that needs to be addressed in the present research method is that all three dimensions of his tory, theory, and works of art are necessary to answer the ques tions related to the art of painting, and these three should be addressed in a balanced way. During the reign of Shah Abbas, the economy reached its mos t advanced level during the Safavid period. In addition, Shah Abbas, with his tact, upgraded the country militarily and security-wise. All the favorable policies of that time can be bes t seen in Isfahan of that period and from the available reports and travelogues. Nevertheless, one should not ignore the socio-cultural gaps and issues, and contradictions of that era. During this period, Reza Abbasi entered the court as a talented young man and grew up. In the middle period of his life, due to his religious tendencies, he dis tanced himself from the court for several years (this period is known as the period of Reza Abbasi’ s rebellion), and after returning to the court, his painting s tyle changed significantly, in terms of both form and theme. During this period, mos t of his works express his dual approach to life. For example, in Golgasht with Ashrafzadeh, although at firs t glance a completely different atmosphere is observed from the second period, with further analysis, it can be concluded that Reza Abbasi in this period of his life is trying to cope the court life and tendencies outside the court. However, in this connection, like the literary tendencies common to poets at that time, there was an attempt to create a special language, enigmatic, metaphorical, and containing content subtleties, which, firs tly, need more reflection to discover its dimensions, and secondly, in no way to the audience. It does not convey a definite and final meaning. Apart from such attempts to cons truct a special language, Reza Abbasi also seeks a way out of the usual tendencies to express his protes t, which, according to current information, is unprecedented until then. Throughout the his tory of painting, imitation of the pas t works has been pervasive, and painters have imitated these works for educational and technical purposes. However, the imitation of Behzad’ s work by Reza Abbasi, for the reasons mentioned, indicates a kind of conscious choice, which, considering its subject, clarifies the content of his protes t. In general, it should be said that Reza Abbasi’ s works in the third period of his life narrate a dual and, at the same time, critical approach to the life and current situation of the society during the artis t’ s life. There is a narrative hidden in the heart of his visual metaphors and clever choices, and it is not possible to receive it except by recognizing the socio-his torical context of the formation of works and the re-creation of the artis t’ s life.